How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
The Supreme Court’s affirmative action decisions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger changed the meaning of “narrow tailoring.” While the narrow tailoring requirement has always had multiple dimensions, a central meaning has been that the government must use the smallest racial preference needed to achieve its compelling interest. We might have expected, therefore, that if the Court ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Issues in Legal Scholarship
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1539-8323
DOI: 10.2202/1539-8323.1142